Available
Jun 10, 2015 at 12am - Jun 12, 2015 at 11:59pm
This assignment was locked Jun 12, 2015 at 11:59pm.
As you can see from the rubric for this speech, you really do need to give a lot of thought to how you did with your persuasive speech. It is very important that you think about what you did or did not accomplish, what feedback you got from your instructor and your peers, and whether there are changes you need to make before taking on your final speech in the course.
As you know, with each assignment, the stakes are higher and the challenges are greater! Think about your entire speech planning, preparation and presentation process as you work on this reflection, so you will be ready to take on and succeed with your final speech in the class!
143416794006/12/201511:59pm
Rubric
824152
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
343959_6251
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
343959_4555
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
343959_1389
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
343959_2715
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
343959_3199
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
343959_8551
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
343959_500
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
343959_1161
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
343959_4992
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
343959_5786
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
Find Rubric