Available
Jun 22, 2015 at 12am - Jun 23, 2015 at 11:59pm
This assignment was locked Jun 23, 2015 at 11:59pm.
As you can see from the rubric for this speech, you really do need to give a lot of thought to how you did with your persuasive speech. It is very important that you think about what you did or did not accomplish, what feedback you got from your instructor and your peers, and whether there are changes you need to make before taking on your final speech in the course. As you know, with each assignment, the stakes are higher and the challenges are greater! Think about your entire speech planning, preparation and presentation process as you work on this reflection, so you will be ready to take on and succeed with your final speech in the class!
143511834006/23/201511:59pm
Rubric
824155
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_2502
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_3324
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_6148
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_8740
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_72
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_6746
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_1816
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_9989
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_205
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_8131
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_2046
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_9921
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_7414
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_4579
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples from semester's speeches are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement, related to major core course competencies.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speeches); Numerous specific examples are cited from speeches throughout the semester; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve, related to major core course competencies.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited examples are provided from semester's speehes, and not specific in nature to support claims/conclusions. Reflection is not balanced (all negative/all positive), appears superficial in self-assessment of attainment of major core course competencies.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited from speeches throughout the semester. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement, related to major core course competencies..
344633_5494
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
Find Rubric