Speech 5 OUTLINE - Monroe's Motivated Sequence Persuasion Speech

Due Jun 24, 2015 by 1pm
Points 50
Submitting a file upload
Available Jun 17, 2015 at 12am - Jun 24, 2015 at 1pm

This assignment was locked Jun 24, 2015 at 1pm.

Once again, you will use the three column outline for this speech, but instead of thinking of main points, think instead like the attorney before the jury - what are your assertions? Label in the left hand column your evidence and indicate whether it is using logos, pathos, or ethos. (Refer to p. 279 of your text.) Also, indicate in the left hand column whether you are making a claim, providing evidence, or offering a warrant. (Refer to p. 289)

You will still use the center column of the outline for your full-sentence outline of your speech. Again, reserve the right column for presentation cues for yourself.

Refer to the rubric below to make sure you have met all of the requirements of this assignment.

Three column outline format - Three Column Outline Template (1).doc Download Three Column Outline Template (1).doc

Sample Completed Outline Sample using MMS: Sample Persuasion Policy Speech Outline.docx Download Sample Persuasion Policy Speech Outline.docx

On the date the outline is due, you will need to provide me with a PRINTED copy of your outline, as well as upload your Word document. These are due before the start of class on the due date.

Rubric

Title:

E2. - Persuasive Speech 2 - Monroe - Outline

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion description

INVENTION - Topic Choice

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

EXEMPLARY: Reflects careful consideration of purpose, audience, and time frame. Reflecfs careful consideration of significance, appropriateness, and scope

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

SATISFACTORY: Appropriately narrowed/ developed for audience, purpose, and time frame. Demonstrafes consideration of significance, appropriateness, and scope

Edit rating Delete rating

2 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Somewhat narrow or broad for audience, purpose, and/ or time frame. Needs more consideration of significance, appropriateness, or scope

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Inappropriate based on considerations of significance, scope, and appropriateness. Inappropriate for speech type chosen.

pts

4 pts

Edit criterion description

INVENTION - Monroe's Attention

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

EXEMPLARY: Attention elements constructed to artfully focus audience on the need

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

SATISFACTORY: Attention elements focus audience on the need

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Attention elements introduce the topic, but are not an effective part of the persuasive appeal

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Introduction elements distract or cause the audience to focus on elements outside of the persuasive task

pts

5 pts

Edit criterion description

INVENTION - Monroe's Defining the Problem

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

EXEMPLARY: Clear and insightful statement of problem. Evidence includes relevant contextual factors. Compelling demonstration of burden of proof appropriate for audience and persuasive claim

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

SATISFACTORY: Constructs a problem with credible evidence. Problem discussion is adequately detailed. Demonstrates burden of proof

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Problem statement is superficial. Inconsistent demonstration of burden of proof

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Limited ability in identifying an effective problem. Does not demonstrate burden of proof

pts

5 pts

Edit criterion description

INVENTION - Monroe's Propose Solutions

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

EXEMPLARY: Solution indicates a deep comprehension of the problem. Solution credibly addresses problem. Solution is sensitive to individual, ethical, logical, and cultural objections

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

SATISFACTORY: Solution indicates comprehension of the problem. Solution is sensitive to contextual factors

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Solution is "off the shelf" rather than individually designed to address the specific problem

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Solution is difficult to evaluate because it is vague or indirectly addresses the problem

pts

5 pts

Edit criterion description

INVENTION - Monroe's Evaluate Potential Solutions (Benefits)

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

EXEMPLARY: Evaluation of solution is thorough. Feasibility. Impacts weighed

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

SATISFACTORY: Evaluation of solutions is adequate, reasonable

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Evaluation of solutions lacks depth or adequate support

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Evaluation of solutions is superficial

pts

5 pts

Edit criterion description

INVENTION - Monroe's Action

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

EXEMPLARY: Action steps demonstrate depth of understanding. There is no doubt that completed action steps will accomplish plan. There is no doubt action will address problem.

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

SATISFACTORY: Action steps demonstrate a clear understanding of audience's ability to act. Action is practical and "actionable". Action steps have a probability of achieving the desired outcome in response to the problem

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Action steps are insufficient, unsupported, or are weakly linked with the desired plan

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Action steps might not exist, or are not connected with desired plan

pts

5 pts

Edit criterion description

INVENTION - Use of Source Citations

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

EXEMPLARY: Skillful use of many high quality, credible, relevant sources to support main ideas

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

SATISFACTORY: Employs correct source citation in speech. Cites minimum number of credible sources

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Inadequate citation of sources or questionable sources

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: No source citations

pts

5 pts

Edit criterion description

INVENTION - Development of Visual Aids

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: No visual aids

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

EXEMPLARY: Develops creative and visually appealing visual aids that enhance thesis

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Visual aids demonstrate lack of attention to purpose, topic, or audience

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

SATISFACTORY: Develops visual aids effectively to support thesis

pts

0 pts

Edit criterion description

ARRANGEMENT - Introduction

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

EXEMPLARY: Introduction includes: Motivating attention-getter that creates desire to listen. Highly important topic. Unique, creative personal credibility statement. Unique, creative, and powerful thesis. Introduction well-developed, satisfying for audience, topic, and purpose

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

SATISFACTORY: Introduction includes: Attention-getting device connecting topic to audience. Statement on importance of topic for audience. Speaker credibility. Concise thesis

Edit rating Delete rating

2 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Introduces topic in some way, but introduction may lack: Attention-getter. Clear thesis/purpose. Audience connection/development

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Introduction missing. Stated "my topic is" or something similar just to start talking

pts

4 pts

Edit criterion description

ARRANGEMENT - Organizational Pattern

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

EXEMPLARY: The outline: Relies on an exceptionally clear, logical progression within/between ideas. Varies transitions

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

SATISFACTORY: The outline: Uses Monroe's Motivated Sequence. Relies on a clear and logical progression within/between ideas. Is easy to follow

Edit rating Delete rating

2 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: The outline relies on: An organizational pattern that is present but unclear. Awkward transitions

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: The outline: Fails to provide a reasonably clear and logical progression within/among ideas. Fails to leave audience with a clear message. Lacks transitions or connections

pts

4 pts

Edit criterion description

ARRANGEMENT - Conclusion

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

EXEMPLARY: Conclusion: Reflects speaker's informed evaluation, ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. Is thought-provoking and satisfying

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

SATISFACTORY: Conclusion: Is logically tied to information. Summarizes main points effectively. States action. Leaves audience with an adequate final statement

Edit rating Delete rating

2 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Conclusion: Is inconsistently tied to some information discussed. May lack reference to thesis, review of main points, or thought-provoking final statement

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Conclusion is abrupt; speech just stops rather than summarizes or concludes

pts

4 pts

Edit criterion description

STYLE - Language

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

EXEMPLARY: Language choices (are): Exceptionally clear, inclusive, vivid, and creative. Enhance audience comprehension, enthusiasm for thesis. Varied in sentence structure, word choice. Strong in standards of grammar, usage

Edit rating Delete rating

3 pts

SATISFACTORY: Outline relies on language that is reasonably clear, vivid, appropriate

Edit rating Delete rating

2 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Outline relies on: Inconsistent language choices that may, at times, be unclear for audience or purpose

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

DEFICIENT: Outline relies on: Unclear or inappropriate language. Undefined jargon. Language that is not inclusive. Language lacks attention to audience and/or purpose

pts

4 pts

Total Points: 50 out of 50

Rubric

Find a Rubric

Title:

Title

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

Description of criterion

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

Full Marks

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

No Marks

pts

5 pts

Total Points: 5 out of 5