Week 3 Going (super) Public
- Due No Due Date
- Points 5
- Submitting a discussion post
This week's discussion encourages us to think about going public online. In a brief post that references the Senft reading concerning "Microcelebrity," discuss the potential for going public with a project from this course.
CATEGORY |
Refined (5 points) |
Developing (3 points) |
Novice (1 or 0 points) |
Activity: |
4 or more replies are given to other student's work |
2-3 replies |
Minimal feedback given to other classmates. |
Content Understanding: |
Has posted an advanced version of assignment, including at least a 150 word response. |
Has a somewhat prepared version of assignment that is lacking in development. |
The assignment is not well prepared, lacking and needs significant work. |
Interaction |
Consistently advances discussion with questions and/or sharing of resources that insures others have a reason and purpose to respond and advance dialogue. |
Sometimes initiates replies to discussion that include questions or sharing of resources that may help to advance conversation. |
Rarely initiates discussion post and replies to discussion include questions or sharing of resources. Posting rarely advances conversation. |
Mechanics |
Presentation is professional looking with no grammatical or spelling errors. |
Presentation is somewhat professional looking and has a few grammatical errors. |
Presentation is not professional looking and has quite a few grammatical errors. |
Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Description of criterion
threshold:
5 pts
|
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
||
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Description of criterion
threshold:
5 pts
|
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
|
pts
/
5 pts
--
|
||
Total Points:
5
out of 5
|