Persusion Speech 2 - Question of Policy Reflection
DueDec 10, 2015 by
7:30am
Points10
Submittinga text entry box or a file upload
Available
Oct 2, 2015 at 12am - Dec 10, 2015 at 11:59pm
This assignment was locked Dec 10, 2015 at 11:59pm.
Unless you reflect on your previous speech and think about what you did right and what you need to improve upon, it is unlikely you will grow from one speech to the next.
In my experience, the tendency of many public speaking students is to gloss over the self-evaluation assignments. These students offer a collective “Whew! Glad that’s done!” and move on to the next assignment without investing the time to think about how and why they did or did not accomplish their previous speech goal. As a result, they continue to carry the same mistakes from the previous speech into the next one.
Students who seem to benefit most from the self-evaluation assignments are those who provide specifics, including successes/errors made in topic selection, research development, speech preparation, speech organization, speech practice, and aspects of the final delivery. The self-evaluation requires you look through two lenses – what you personally experienced during the speech process as well as how your efforts were viewed from an audience perspective.
If you merely state in your self-evaluation that you did this or that, and you thought it was successful without considering what feedback you received on the outcome from your classmates and instructor, you are not fulfilling an important aspect of the self-evaluation assignment.
As you can see from the rubric for this speech, you really do need to give a lot of thought to how you did with your persuasive speech. It is very important that you think about what you did or did not accomplish, what feedback you got from your instructor and your peers, and whether there are changes you need to make before taking on your final speech in the course.
As you know, with each assignment, the stakes are higher and the challenges are greater! Think about your entire speech planning, preparation and presentation process as you work on this reflection, so you will be ready to take on and succeed with your final speech in the class!
144975060012/10/201507:30am
Rubric
838534
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_2502
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_3324
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_6148
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_8740
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_72
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Claims, evidence and warrants are not cited or evaluated. Paper lacks evaluation of appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_6746
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific claims, evidence, and warrants are cited and thoughtfully evaluated, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, and logos. Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited claims, evidence and warrants are cited, as well as limited examples of appeals based on ethos, pathos,or logos. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Claims, evidence, and warrants are cited, as well as appeals based on ethos, pathos, or logos. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_1816
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_9989
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_205
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_8131
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_2046
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_9921
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_7414
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement.
344633_4579
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples from semester's speeches are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement, related to major core course competencies.
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speeches); Numerous specific examples are cited from speeches throughout the semester; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve, related to major core course competencies.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Limited examples are provided from semester's speehes, and not specific in nature to support claims/conclusions. Reflection is not balanced (all negative/all positive), appears superficial in self-assessment of attainment of major core course competencies.
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited from speeches throughout the semester. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement, related to major core course competencies..
344633_5494
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.