Paper #2
- Due Apr 13, 2016 by 11:15am
- Points 100
- Submitting a file upload
- File Types doc and docx
Guidelines for Writing Papers
For each paper assigned, develop a thesis, or narrowly focused argument, that addresses the selected topic from a particular angle. If you need help selecting a topic or developing a thesis, consult with me, after carefully reading the guidelines and suggestions included in the syllabus. There is more than one “correct” answer; feel free to exercise creativity and take risks in constructing an interesting, convincing argument. REL-C330 essays are NOT research papers, and undergraduates may NOT use internet or other outside sources without first obtaining specific permission from the professor. Use assigned readings, lectures, artifacts, and discussions for ideas and evidence to support your position, but I am more interested in your analysis than in your summary of these materials.
Paper #2 (4-6 pages) = 100 points
The second paper should compare two primary source texts assigned for this class. The texts might be drawn from the same class session or two different sessions. For instance, you might compare Benjamin Warfield’s with F. F. Bosworth’s ideas on healing or Charles Sheldon’s with Tim LaHaye’s and Jerry Jenkins’ views of the kingdom of God. Consider similarities and differences between the texts and reasons why these similarities and differences exist and are important. Use the close reading skills you developed in the first paper assignment, including paying attention to diction and form as well as historical and cultural context. Construct a focused argument that tells the reader how to think about a certain aspect or theme in these texts and why thinking about the texts in this way is important. Be sure to indicate what is at stake and why a reader should care about your argument. If you are feeling creative, you might, as a variation on this assignment, construct a “hypothetical dialogue” between the authors of the two texts. Think about what the authors, if given the chance, might have said to each other about one of the themes discussed in this class. After framing the comparison in your own voice in an introductory paragraph, write a dialogue in the voices of the two authors, perhaps in the form of a coffee-shop conversation or an exchange of letters. Provide a final paragraph, in your own voice, that makes explicit the analysis that informs the creative sections of the essay and that tells the reader what should be learned from this creative exercise.
How to Prepare to Write:
I recognize that there are multiple effective writing styles, but I suggest the following basic structure for course papers. First, write your name, the assignment name, and date at the top of page one. Next, supply a descriptive title. Use the first paragraph to 1) invite the reader’s interest (e.g. with a quotation, question, or startling fact), 2) identify the text(s) to be discussed, incl. a) author’s full name, b) title (in italics for a book or movie, or quotes for an essay), c) publication date, 3) provide a roadmap of how the argument will be developed (e.g. This paper will explore three reasons that Whitefield’s sermons should be considered revolutionary. First, . . .), and 4) state the thesis (the last sentence of the first paragraph). The thesis is the most important sentence in the paper! The thesis is more than a statement of the topic; it is an argument about the topic that makes a case for why anyone should care. The thesis should provide a clear answer to questions raised by the essay; do not try to keep the reader in suspense until the conclusion. Begin each body paragraph with a topic sentence (or mini-thesis) that forwards the thesis. Next, each body paragraph should include specific textual evidence, e.g. quotations, facts, or paraphrased information (with appropriate citations—including page numbers), and analysis of how the evidence supports the topic sentence and thesis. Write a concluding sentence that explains the significance of the paragraph and provides a transition to the next. Do not end any paragraph with a quotation; most such quotations have not been adequately analyzed. Paragraphs should build on each other to carry the thesis forward through the progression of the paper. In the concluding paragraph, recap the thesis of the essay, remind the reader of how you have proven your position, and emphasize the implications.
How to Cite Your Sources:
Every paragraph that borrows ideas, quotations, or paraphrased information from another source—incl. course texts, lectures, discussion comments, (and, when used, websites—NOT permitted for REL-C330 students)—must be documented meticulously; either endnotes or parenthetical references (with accompanying works cited list) are acceptable. If endnotes are used, a works cited list is unnecessary. Endnote markers should be positioned at the end of the sentence (or after a semicolon), after the punctuation (e.g. Chavda describes his father as a “striking man, with rich black hair.”1). Help with source citation may be found online from Writing Tutorial Services, “Pamphlets” (www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets.shtml), and College of Arts and Sciences, “Plagiarism” (www.indiana.edu/%7Ecollege/plagiarism/index.shtml). I strongly advise purchasing a style manual, such as Kate Turabian, A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, 7th rev. ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), or (for graduate students) The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010)—available online through IU. N.B., bibliographic information supplied on the syllabus will in most instances need to be reformatted for use in endnotes or works cited lists. For example, for a reference to page 23 of Left Behind, parenthetical: (LaHaye & Jenkins, Left Behind, 23); endnote: Tim F. LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, Left Behind: A Novel of the Earth’s Last Days (Wheaton, Ill.: Tyndale, 1995), 23. (no need for “p.” ); Works Cited: LaHaye, Tim F. and Jenkins, Jerry B. Left Behind: A Novel of the Earth’s Last Days. Wheaton, Ill.: Tyndale, 1995.
How to Format and Proofread Your Paper:
I expect essays to be formatted in exact compliance with syllabus guidelines and will deduct points if guidelines are not followed. Adopt a “formal” writing style; avoid contractions, colloquial expressions, use of the second person or excessive use of the first person. Write in the active voice; always assign agency (who did what). Proofread for spelling, grammatical or typographical errors. For questions on writing style, purchase William Strunk and E. B. White, The Elements of Style, 4th ed. (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2000), and/or Christopher Lasch’s Plain Style: A Guide to Written English (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002). You might also consult the chapter “Fixing Weak Theses,” from David Rosenwasser and Jill Stephen’s book, Writing Analytically, 2nd ed.(Fort Worth, Tex.: Harcourt College, 2000), posted on Canvas, and pamphlets from Writing Tutorial Services (www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets.shtml). Every graduate student should own and read: Joan Bolker’s Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day (New York: Owl, 1998).
Avoid common writing errors. “While” means “at the same time”; “although” means “in spite of the fact that.” “Like” indicates comparison; “such as” denotes an example. The procedure had an undesirable “effect,” but the procedure “affected” him; the procedure “effected” a change. A comma should precede the last item in lists. Avoid awkward self-referential phrases, e.g. “As previously stated”; instead, clarify the essay’s organization. An ellipsis is not needed at the beginning or end of a quotation; to indicate omission of text within a quotation, use three periods with a total of five spaces separating them. ( . . . ); if a period ends the sentence before the omission, this is additional (. . . . ); beware of auto-replace and preset formatting in Word! Write out number names when referencing centuries, etc.; hyphenate if used as an adjective (in the eighteenth century, but eighteenth-century society). In general, do not begin a sentence with a conjunction such as “However”; instead, position it within the sentence (e.g. I was, however, mad.). When first introducing a source from whom a quotation is drawn, give first and last name and a brief identifier, e.g. “Noted historian of evangelicalism Mark Noll argues . . .” Use 8 ½” by 11” paper, 12-point Times New Roman font (this includes endnotes), double space (do not skip lines between paragraphs or allow Word to add space points between lines—you may need to adjust the spacing settings under the Paragraph tab to “0”), 1” margins on all sides (n.b. the default setting in MS Word is 1.25”—change it!), indent five spaces at the start of each paragraph. Number pages in the top right corner (starting on p. 2). Submit your essay in a standard file format, such as Word or rtf. Your filename must have an extension (e.g. doc, docx); on a Mac, check the “append file extension” checkbox when you save your file. Do not include any unsupported characters, such as a number sign (#) in your filename.
Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis
Is the thesis easy to locate (e.g. last sentence of first paragraph), clear, unified, debatable, and sufficiently narrow?
Does the thesis make clear what is at stake (i.e. why the essay matters, why readers should care), or does it leave you asking: “so what”?
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Organization
Does the essay’s opening invite the reader's interest (e.g. with a descriptive title and opening quotation, question, or startling fact)?
Does the introduction identify the source(s) to be discussed, incl. author, title (in quotes or italics, as appropriate), date?
Does the introduction provide a roadmap (i.e. preview of major topics) of how the thesis will be developed?
Does each paragraph have a topic sentence that is a mini-thesis (i.e. sub-argument that advances the main argument)?
Is the order of presentation logical and easy to follow?
Are transitions between paragraphs smooth?
Are there parts of the essay that are confusing or that do not seem to fit?
Does the conclusion tie up loose ends, convince you of the essay's significance, and/or suggest further implications of the argument?
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Evidence
Does the paper make effective use of assigned readings, lectures, discussions (avoiding inappropriate use of outside sources)?
Does the evidence presented persuade you of the thesis?
Are choices of when to quote rather than summarize appropriate?
Are any of the quotations longer than necessary?
Is there a good balance between general and specific information?
Does the paper raise and adequately address any conflicting evidence?
Is evidence documented properly (e.g. properly formatted endnotes or parentheticals plus reference list)?
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Analysis
Is textual evidence accompanied by thorough explanations of what the evidence means and why it is significant?
Is the essay’s reasoning persuasive?
Does the essay provide fresh insight into course themes?
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Style
Does the writing style contribute to the essay’s overall effectiveness?
Does the essay use active rather than passive voice and assign agency (i.e. make clear who did what)?
Is the tone appropriately formal (e.g. avoiding contractions, colloquial expressions, use of second person or first person)?
Are there any awkward expressions or mistakes in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc.?
Are there certain kinds of mistakes that occur frequently?
Does the format conform to course guidelines (e.g. length, 12-point Times New Roman, double spaced, 1” margins, pages numbered)?
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||
Total Points:
100
out of 100
|