Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 22 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
SEEi - Impact Speech Delivery Online Spring 2015
SEEi - Impact Speech Delivery Online Spring 2015
Criteria Ratings Pts
INVENTION - Topic Choice
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Reflects careful consideration of purpose, audience and time frame; Reflects careful consideration of significance, appropriateness and scope
4 pts
SATISFACTORY: Appropriately narrowed/developed for audience, purpose and time frame; Demonstrates consideration of significance, appropriateness and scope
3 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Somewhat narrow or broad for audience, purpose and/or time frame; Needs more consideration of significance, appropriateness, or scope
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Inappropriate based on considerations of significance, scope and appropriateness; Inappropriate for type of speech chosen
pts
5 pts
--
INVENTION - Content Development; Support of Thesis
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: In addition to satisfactory, thorough development of content, which includes: Well-written main points; Main points well-supported with varied and compelling examples, stories, stats, testimony and other support relevant to speech type; Supporting ideas that relate in exceptional way to thesis
4 pts
SATISFACTORY: Speech identifies distinct main points appropriate for audience and purpose; Connects content development to speech chosen; Relies on adequate evidence in support of main points.
3 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Speech: Main points present, unbalanced, overlap or in other ways are indistinct; Includes some supporting material, but overall inadequate or inconsistent support relevant to purpose
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Speech: Main points unclear; Lacks supporting details
pts
5 pts
--
INVENTION - Use of Source Citations
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Skillful use of many high-quality, credible, relevant sources to support main ideas
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Employs correct source citation out loud in speech; Cites minimum number of credible sources out loud
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Inadequate citation of sources or questionable sources
0 pts
DEFICIENT: No source citations
pts
5 pts
--
INVENTION - Development of Visual Aids
threshold: pts
4 pts
EXEMPLARY: Develops creative and visually appealing visual aids that enhance thesis
2 pts
SATISFACTORY: Develops visual aids effectively to support thesis
1 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Visual aids demonstrate lack of attention to purpose, topic or audience
0 pts
DEFICIENT: No visual aids
pts
4 pts
--
ARRANGEMENT - Introduction
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Introduction includes: Motivating, attention-getter, creates desire to listen; Highly important topic; Unique, creative personal credibility statement; Unique, creative and powerful thesis; Introduction well-developed, satisfying for audience, topic and purpose
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Introduction includes: Attention-getting device connecting topic and audience; Statement on importance of topic for audience; Speaker credibility; Concise thesis
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Introduces in some way, but introduction may lack: attention-getter, clear thesis, purpose, audience connection and/or development
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Introduction missing; Stated “my topic is” or something similar just to start talking
pts
5 pts
--
ARRANGEMENT - Organizational Pattern
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: The speech: Relies on exceptionally clear, logical progression within/between ideas; Leaves audience with undeniable message; Organization compelling, moves audience through speech with ease; Varies transitions
4 pts
SATISFACTORY: The speech: Uses organization appropriate for assignment/purpose; Relies on reasonably clear and logical progression within/between ideas; Leaves audience with clear message; Is easy to follow, ideas adequately connected
1 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: The speech relies on an organizational pattern that is present but unclear; Awkward transitions
0 pts
DEFICIENT: The speech: Fails to provide clear and logical progression within/among ideas; Fails to leave audience with a clear message; Lacks transitions or connections
pts
5 pts
--
ARRANGEMENT - Conclusion
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: In addition to satisfactory, conclusion is thought-provoking and satisfying
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Conclusion: Is logically tied to information; Summarizes may points effectively; Leaves audience with an adequate final statement
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Conclusion: Is inconsistently tied to some information discussed; May lack reference to thesis, review of main points or thought-provoking final statement
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Conclusion is abrupt; speech just stops rather than summarizes or concludes
pts
5 pts
--
STYLE - Language
threshold: pts
4 pts
EXEMPLARY: Language choices (are) Exceptionally clear, inclusive, vivid and creative; Enhance audience comprehension, enthusiasm for thesis; Varied in sentence structure, word choice; Strong in standards of grammar, usage
2 pts
SATISFACTORY: Speech relies on language that is reasonably clear, vivid, appropriate
1 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Speech relies on inconsistent language choices that may, at times, be unclear for audience or purpose
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Speech relies on: Unclear or inappropriate language; Undefined jargon; Language that is not inclusive; Language lacks attention to audience and/or purpose
pts
4 pts
--
DELIVERY - Physical Delivery
threshold: pts
4 pts
EXEMPLARY: Speaker demonstrates polished techniques of physical delivery; Physical delivery consistently supports verbal message and enhances speaker credibility; Physical delivery adds interest; Speaker is comfortable
2 pts
SATISFACTORY: Speaker demonstrates acceptable posture, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, and dress; Physical delivery generally supports message in ways that neither distract from the speaker’s credibility nor interfere with the message
1 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: The speaker, at times, rely on inconsistent delivery choices that include: Awkward posture, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact and/or dress; Posture, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact and/or dress that detract from speaker credibility or distract audience from message
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Reading speech or insufficient eye contact or poise
pts
4 pts
--
DELIVERY - Vocal Delivery
threshold: pts
4 pts
EXEMPLARY: Strong vocal variety; Effective volume; Invites positive connection with audience; Creates attention, interest throughout
2 pts
SATISFACTORY: Adequate use of vocal variety; Strong volume; Few vocal fillers
1 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Ineffective or awkward use of vocal variety and volume
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Inadequate volume and/or tone; Verbal fillers distracting
pts
4 pts
--
DELIVERY - Timing
threshold: pts
4 pts
EXEMPLARY: Meets the stated time requirements.
2 pts
SATISFACTORY: Meets the stated time requirements.
1 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Fails to meet the stated time requirements.
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Fails to meet the stated time requirements.
pts
4 pts
--
Total Points: 50 out of 50