Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 3 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
SEEI - Impact Speech - Reflection
SEEI - Impact Speech - Reflection
Criteria Ratings Pts
Reflects on Preparation, Presentation, and role as an Audience Member
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
3 pts
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
pts
5 pts
--
Summary of Learning
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY – Reflects thoughtful integration of peer and instructor feedback, as well as personal reflection (upon viewing of recorded speech); Numerous specific examples are cited; Student provides balanced reflection on what did right and what needs to improve; Specific and concrete plan of action to remedy problem areas is developed. Audience perspective figures heavily in plan of action.
3 pts
SATISFACTORY – Reflects peer/instructor feedback and personal reflection. Some examples are cited. Student mentions what was effective and what needs improvement. General plan of action included. Includes some references to audience feedback.
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Reflects primarily view of speaker and does not consider peer and instructor feedback/audience perspective. Examples are provided, but not specific in nature. Reflection is not balanced. Action plan is superficial and lacks specifics.
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Lacks inclusion of personal reflection, peer and instructor feedback, and audience perspective. Examples are not provided. Lacks inventory of speaker assets/areas for improvement. No plan of action is included.
pts
5 pts
--
Total Points: 10 out of 10