Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 21 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Explain Speech Delivery Rubric (60pts) Spring2015
Explain Speech Delivery Rubric (60pts) Spring2015
Criteria Ratings Pts
INVENTION - Topic Choice
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Reflects careful consideration of purpose, audience and time frame; Reflects careful consideration of significance, appropriateness and scope
4 pts
SATISFACTORY: Appropriately narrowed/developed for audience, purpose and time frame; Demonstrates consideration of significance, appropriateness and scope
3 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Somewhat narrow or broad for audience, purpose and/or time frame; Needs more consideration of significance, appropriateness, or scope
1 pts
DEFICIENT: Inappropriate based on considerations of significance, scope and appropriateness; Inappropriate for type of speech chosen
pts
5 pts
--
INVENTION - Concept Development, Support of Thesis
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: In addition to satisfactory, thorough development of content, which includes: Well-written main points; Main points well-supported with varied and compelling examples, stories, stats, testimony and other support relevant to speech type; Supporting ideas that relate in exceptional way to thesis
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Speech identifies distinct main points appropriate for audience and purpose; Connects content development to speech chosen; Relies on adequate evidence in support of main points.
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Speech: Main points present, unbalanced, overlap or in other ways are indistinct; Includes some supporting material, but overall inadequate or inconsistent support relevant to purpose
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Speech: Main points unclear; Lacks supporting details
pts
5 pts
--
INVENTION - Use of Source Citations
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Skillful use of many high-quality, credible, relevant sources to support main ideas
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Employs correct source citation out loud in speech; Cites minimum number of credible sources out loud
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Inadequate citation of sources or questionable sources
0 pts
DEFICIENT: No source citations
pts
5 pts
--
INVENTION - Development of Visual Aids
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Develops creative and visually appealing visual aids that enhance thesis
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Develops visual aids effectively to support thesis
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Visual aids demonstrate lack of attention to purpose, topic or audience
0 pts
DEFICIENT: No visual aids
pts
5 pts
--
ARRANGEMENT - Introduction
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Introduction includes: Motivating, attention-getter, creates desire to listen; Highly important topic; Unique, creative personal credibility statement; Unique, creative and powerful thesis; Introduction well-developed, satisfying for audience, topic and purpose
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Introduction includes: Attention-getting device connecting topic and audience; Statement on importance of topic for audience; Speaker credibility; Concise thesis
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Introduces in some way, but introduction may lack: attention-getter, clear thesis, purpose, audience connection and/or development
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Introduction missing; Stated “my topic is” or something similar just to start talking
pts
5 pts
--
ARRANGEMENT - Organizational Pattern
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: The speech: Relies on exceptionally clear, logical progression within/between ideas; Leaves audience with undeniable message; Organization compelling, moves audience through speech with ease; Varies transitions
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: The speech: Uses organization appropriate for assignment/purpose; Relies on reasonably clear and logical progression within/between ideas; Leaves audience with clear message; Is easy to follow, ideas adequately connected
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: The speech relies on an organizational pattern that is present but unclear; Awkward transitions
0 pts
DEFICIENT: The speech: Fails to provide clear and logical progression within/among ideas; Fails to leave audience with a clear message; Lacks transitions or connections
pts
5 pts
--
ARRANGEMENT - Conclusion
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: In addition to satisfactory, conclusion is thought-provoking and satisfying
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Conclusion: Is logically tied to information; Summarizes may points effectively; Leaves audience with an adequate final statement
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Conclusion: Is inconsistently tied to some information discussed; May lack reference to thesis, review of main points or thought-provoking final statement
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Conclusion is abrupt; speech just stops rather than summarizes or concludes
pts
5 pts
--
STYLE - Language
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Language choices (are) Exceptionally clear, inclusive, vivid and creative; Enhance audience comprehension, enthusiasm for thesis; Varied in sentence structure, word choice; Strong in standards of grammar, usage
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Speech relies on language that is reasonably clear, vivid, appropriate
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Speech relies on inconsistent language choices that may, at times, be unclear for audience or purpose
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Speech relies on: Unclear or inappropriate language; Undefined jargon; Language that is not inclusive; Language lacks attention to audience and/or purpose
pts
5 pts
--
DELIVERY - Physical Delivery
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Speaker demonstrates polished techniques of physical delivery; Physical delivery consistently supports verbal message and enhances speaker credibility; Physical delivery adds interest; Speaker is comfortable
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Speaker demonstrates acceptable posture, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, and dress; Physical delivery generally supports message in ways that neither distract from the speaker’s credibility nor interfere with the message
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: The speaker, at times, rely on inconsistent delivery choices that include: Awkward posture, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact and/or dress; Posture, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact and/or dress that detract from speaker credibility or distract audience from message
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Reading speech or insufficient eye contact or poise
pts
5 pts
--
DELIVERY - Vocal Delivery
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Strong vocal variety; Effective volume; Invites positive connection with audience; Creates attention, interest throughout
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Adequate use of vocal variety; Strong volume; Few vocal fillers
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Ineffective or awkward use of vocal variety and volume
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Inadequate volume and/or tone; Verbal fillers distracting
pts
5 pts
--
DELIVERY - Timing
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY: Meets the stated time requirements.
3 pts
SATISFACTORY: Meets the stated time requirements.
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Fails to meet the stated time requirements.
0 pts
DEFICIENT: Fails to meet the stated time requirements.
pts
5 pts
--
Powerpoint - Visual Aid
threshold: pts
5 pts
EXEMPLARY
3 pts
SATISFACTORY:
2 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Total Points: 60 out of 60