Submit Final Outline - Question of Policy Speech (MMS)
DueAug 2, 2015 by
11pm
Points55
Submittinga file upload
This week, the speaker's lab mentors have had the opportunity to review your Question of Policy (MMS) speech outline and suggested changes to improve your outline. After you have made the changes to your final draft of your speech outline, you will upload the final draft to this assignment tab for your instructor to grade.
143857080008/02/201511:00pm
Rubric
true
824968
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.
EXEMPLARY: Reflects careful consideration of purpose, audience, and time frame. Reflecfs careful consideration of significance, appropriateness, and scope
SATISFACTORY: Appropriately narrowed/ developed for audience, purpose, and time frame. Demonstrafes consideration of significance, appropriateness, and scope
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Somewhat narrow or broad for audience, purpose, and/ or time frame. Needs more consideration of significance, appropriateness, or scope
EXEMPLARY: Clear and insightful statement of problem. Evidence includes relevant contextual factors. Compelling demonstration of burden of proof appropriate for audience and persuasive claim
EXEMPLARY: Solution indicates a deep comprehension of the problem. Solution credibly addresses problem. Solution is sensitive to individual, ethical, logical, and cultural objections
EXEMPLARY: Action steps demonstrate depth of understanding. There is no doubt that completed action steps will accomplish plan. There is no doubt action will address problem.
SATISFACTORY: Action steps demonstrate a clear understanding of audience's ability to act. Action is practical and "actionable". Action steps have a probability of achieving the desired outcome in response to the problem
EXEMPLARY: Introduction includes: Motivating attention-getter that creates desire to listen. Highly important topic. Unique, creative personal credibility statement. Unique, creative, and powerful thesis. Introduction well-developed, satisfying for audience, topic, and purpose
SATISFACTORY: Introduction includes: Attention-getting device connecting topic to audience. Statement on importance of topic for audience. Speaker credibility. Concise thesis
DEFICIENT: The outline: Fails to provide a reasonably clear and logical progression within/among ideas. Fails to leave audience with a clear message. Lacks transitions or connections
343547_2126
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
EXEMPLARY: Conclusion: Reflects speaker's informed evaluation, ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. Is thought-provoking and satisfying
SATISFACTORY: Conclusion: Is logically tied to information. Summarizes main points effectively. States action. Leaves audience with an adequate final statement
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Conclusion: Is inconsistently tied to some information discussed. May lack reference to thesis, review of main points, or thought-provoking final statement
EXEMPLARY: Language choices (are): Exceptionally clear, inclusive, vivid, and creative. Enhance audience comprehension, enthusiasm for thesis. Varied in sentence structure, word choice. Strong in standards of grammar, usage
DEFICIENT: Outline relies on: Unclear or inappropriate language. Undefined jargon. Language that is not inclusive. Language lacks attention to audience and/or purpose
343547_2757
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
Find Rubric